Community Foundations: National Contest Calls for Your Local Information Experiments

February 4, 2010

Civic engagement, got an app for that? Knight Foundation wants to hear from you!

The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation is accepting applications from community and place-based foundations seeking to fund news and information projects. The deadline for the Knight Community Information Challenge, a matching grant program, is March 8. Applications can be submitted at www.informationneeds.org.

Recognizing the growing role that foundations are playing in connecting citizens with information about their communities (see Minnesota Compass for a great example of this), Knight Foundation has created the five-year contest to help local foundations find creative ways to fund media projects that inform and engage residents about pressing issues. So far, the Challenge has awarded $7.3 million for 45 ideas in communities large and small. The projects include funding public interest online news sites, creating online hubs to engage communities around specific issues, and filling gaps in the types of news and information available locally.

Representatives from community or place-based foundations with questions about the Challenge can participate in one of two live chats to have queries answered online by Knight Foundation program officers. The live chats will take place at noon EDT Feb. 16 and 22 at www.informationneeds.org. Visit the site to learn more and sign up for a reminder.

Image CC Csailia


Inclusivity, Equality and Diversity — A Challenge, and A Call to Action

December 11, 2009

“If people are supported to work towards equity, diversity and inclusion, they will do it.” This was the inspiring message delivered by Susan Taylor Batten at the MCF 40th Anniversary and Annual Member Meeting.

Susan Taylor Batten

Susan Taylor Batten, President & CEO of ABFE, presented as keynote speaker at the MCF 40th Anniversary and Annual Member Meeting.

More than 70 MCF members, trustees and staff joined together on a snowy Dec. 8th evening to celebrate MCF’s 40th year, and to hear Susan Batten, president and CEO of the Association of Black Foundation Executives (ABFE), deliver her keynote presentation titled “Philanthropy’s Leadership Challenge.”

According to Batten, the challenge before us is the need to foster leadership that is diverse and reflective of the populations that foundations and nonprofits serve. As she repeated during her speech, “We share a common fate.”  To ensure that our fate — and our future — is the best of all possible outcomes, leaders across spectrums of race, ethnicity, gender and ability must be represented in the highest ranks of the philanthropic field.

Batten presented the teachings that she’s learned over the course of her rich career in the independent sector through the framework of MCF’s own STRATEGY | 2010 strategic plan. In order to meet the challenge of encouraging diversity in philanthropic leadership, foundations and grantmaking organizations must:

  • Lead:
    We must use our unique platform to speak specifically and intentionally about race, gender and class disparities. We need to communicate that we share a common fate. We live, now more than ever, in an ecosystem of communities. The health of one community can not be neglected in this interconnected web, or all will suffer the consequences.
  • Serve:
    We must continue to deliver high-quality services to our communities and stakeholders. We must do that by working differently using the sophisticated analytical tools available to us to determine the effect of our investment strategies on specific demographics. We must build cultural skills and competencies within our organizations, and we must actively engage end beneficiaries in our work to ensure the design of our investment strategies is sound.
  • Build:
    Finally, we must build new practices and policies that create opportunities for all. Racial disparities are created and maintained through policies and practices that contain barriers. The only way to fix these inequities is to identify and focus on actively correcting these barriers within our institutions.

“Given the right messages and tools,” Batten confidently reiterated at the closing of her speech, “…people will work towards equality, diversity and inclusivity.” As philanthropic leaders, we are ideally positioned to be the change that we want to see in the world. This is, as Batten stated, “The field of ideas and innovations — where you can take risks.”

If you are ready to accept Batten’s challenge for the field of philanthropy, we invite you to begin by reading up on MCF’s Diversity Resources. There you will find useful tools to assist you in your work, including the Race Matters Toolkit, a kit developed by Batten and her colleagues during her time as senior associate with the Annie E. Casey Foundation.

Start the conversation: Funders, what tools, like the Race Matters Toolkit, have you used to make decisions about your organization’s philanthropic investment strategy? If you’re a nonprofit reader, have you changed the way you report on your work to help you and potential funders see the impact your work has on different demographic groups?

- Cary Lenore Walski, MCF web communications associate


Charting a Course From the Boardroom Table

November 16, 2009

At kitchen tables across America, we’re mulling over what the current economic situation means for each of us. Jobs, bills, education, loans, investments, travel, holiday shopping, donations.

With the exception of holiday shopping and perhaps travel, similar conversations are happening around foundation boardroom tables as well.

Decisions to shift funding guidelines, focus areas, investment practices, grant timelines, grant payouts, internal staffing and organizational short- and long-term priorities – the list goes on – are not made lightly or quickly. And for many board members and trustees, this is the first time they’ve encountered such significant and perhaps drastic discussions.

These conversations and decisions by foundation leaders are critical and necessary. MCF’s Effective Governance Principle calls for its members to share a commitment to excellence and achieve effective governance by ensuring performance in the areas of stewardship of assets, donor intent, fiduciary responsibility and sound decision-making.

Join the conversation: What types of effective governance decisions has your organization made during these challenging times? What shifts and changes in how your organizations does its work have resulted from discussions by your board or executive leadership in response to the economic stresses we’re facing?

Here is one example: Marina Munoz Lyon, vice president of the Carl and Eloise Pohlad Family Foundation, recalls going to the offices of Pohlad family members to discuss how the foundation could step up to support communities in need.  The foundation, winner of the 2009 Minnesota Nonprofit Award for Responsive Philanthropy, established a $20 million Economic Crisis Initiative last spring.

In the video below, which was shown at the awards presentation at the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits and Minnesota Council on Foundations Joint Conference Nov. 5-6, Jim Pohlad, Pohlad Foundation board member, says, “We took a big chunk of principle and decided that it’s more important to spend it now.”

- Chris Murakami Noonan, MCF communications associate


Leading Through Change – At This Week’s MCN/MCF Joint Annual Conference

November 2, 2009

Any nonprofit that wasn’t feeling stretched and stressed before the recession most certainly has since the “R” word became a reality. While the outlook is still uncertain, the Joint Annual Conference of the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits and the Minnesota Council on Foundations will provide essential tools and knowledge to weather the storm.

Titled Transforming Our Work: From Challenging Times to Hopeful Futures, the conference will run this Thursday and Friday, Nov. 5 and 6.

One of the featured speakers will be Susan Gross, cofounder of Management Assistance Group and author of Seven Turning Points: Leading Through Pivotal Transitions in Organizational Life, published last spring by Fieldstone Alliance.

According to the book synopsis: “Gross defines turning points as critical junctures at which organizations must adjust their leadership, management, structure, governance, and operating style to fit their changed circumstances…Organizations will know they’ve reached a turning point when the structure, management approach, leadership style, and organizational culture that once worked just fine begin to sow a host of new tensions and problems…Organizations do not always evolve in an orderly fashion, graduating from one life cycle to the next. ”

Here are Gross’ seven turning points as outlined in her book.  Some food for thought:

  • Turning Point 1: Do we need to get organized?
  • Turning Point 2: Do we need infrastructure?
  • Turning Point 3: Do we need to let go?
  • Turning Point 4: Do we need to focus?
  • Turning Point 5: Do we need to decentralize power?
  • Turning Point 6: Do we need to recapture our core?
  • Turning Point 7: How do we move on?

For insight on the causes, symptoms and how to guide organizations through these turning points and achieve greater effectiveness, impact and staying power, check out Gross’ breakout session at the MCN/MCF Joint Annual Conference, Thursday, Nov. 5, 1 to 4:30 p.m. Gross is also the keynote speaker at the conference’s CEO/Trustee Dinner, Thursday at 6 p.m., when she’ll discuss “Leading in a Time of Uncertainty and Change.”

– Chris Murakami Noonan, MCF communications associate


Grantmakers Say Money Is Only One Party at the Partnership Table

October 13, 2009

“How can we accomplish the greatest good?”

Jim Hoolihan, president/CEO of the Blandin Foundation, says his foundation starts its work by asking this. Exploring this question has meant that partnership work is now embedded in Blandin’s culture.

Minnesota grantmakers’ belief that more can be done through collaborating is leading to substantial and innovative collaborations. Several of these are highlighted in the just-published Fall 2009 issue of MCF’s Giving Forum, including initiatives of the Blandin Foundation, Dorsey & Whitney, Hispanics in Philanthropy, IBM, Carl and Eloise Pohlad Family Foundation, St. Croix Valley Foundation, Social Venture Partners, and others.

These grantmakers say, though, that partnership work is not always easy work. Addressing power dynamics is one key issue. Is it possible to have true collaboration when one party holds the purse strings?

If funding is viewed as only one piece of the collaboration amongst several at the table, then the answer is yes.

“Each organization brings something to the table, whether it be relationships, connections, knowledge, influence or the ability to leverage other resources,” notes Jill Shannon, director of community partnerships, St. Croix Valley Foundation. “We’re all the same that way, yet we touch our communities differently. Whether a grantee or a grantor, we can work together to accomplish a common goal. The task at hand is to see what each organization can bring forward to reach that shared goal.”

Hoolihan adds, “In some cases, we may have more money, but another partner may have more experience, and another may have more knowledge. Every partner brings something unique, and we recognize that what each brings to the collaboration is just as valuable as money… We do not have all the answers, and money by itself accomplishes nothing.”

For effective collaborations, partners not only must acknowledge the value each brings to the table, grantmakers must commit to listening sincerely with the intention of learning, and nonprofits must not be afraid to speak honestly and directly.

- Chris Murakami Noonan, MCF communications associate


Destination 2010: A Case for the Power of Public/Private Partnerships

October 7, 2009

A recent article in the Star Tribune featured students of the Destination 2010 project, an example of a successful private/public partnership in the state of Minnesota.

Destination 2010 began in 2001 when The Minneapolis Foundation partnered with 7 local schools to provide special programming for the entire 3rd grade class at each school for the next 9 years.

The  goal was to see if a combination of programming and the use of liaisons who worked side-by-side with kids — to help them and advocate on their behalf within schools — would significantly improve the odds that these children would eventually graduate from high school and pursue a post- secondary degree.

The incentive for these youngsters to participate? If they maintained good grades, and remained in either the Saint Paul or Minneapolis school districts, they would receive a $10,000 scholarship for college or $5,000 for vocational training. Not too shabby.

Of the original group of students only 135 students remain scattered across 42 schools in Minneapolis and Saint Paul. For those who remain it’s clear that the program has made a huge impact on their lives.

In the Star Tribune article participant DeShaun Banks reported,

“It definitely made me work harder in school, knowing that Destination 2010 was the backbone right behind me. It’s like a support group for teenagers to stay in school and get where you want to be.”

Destination 2010 is just one example of the many public/private partnerships that grantmakers across the state of Minnesota have undertaken. MCF will be reporting on the power of partnerships in our next issue of Giving Forum, our quarterly newspaper on grantmaking in Minnesota, which will be released next week. Click here to sign up to receive this free, quarterly newspaper.

Chris Murakami Noonan reported on Destination 2010 and other educational initiatives undertaken by MCF members in the Summer 2009 issue of Giving Forum. If you’d like to learn more about Destination 2010 specifically, read the article in the Star Tribune, or visit The Minneapolis Foundation website.

-Cary Lenore Walski, MCF web communications associate


Unrestricted Operating Support, One Foundation Makes the Leap

September 24, 2009

A recent article in the Stanford Social Innovation Review gives an overview of what authors Goggins Gregory and Howard refer to as the “nonprofit starvation cycle.”

This cycle is defined by a nonprofit feeling pressure to reduce their overhead to the point where it begins to erode the organization’s basic ability to function by cutting too far back on investments in both people and technology. The article posits that this cycle is an artifact of the fixation that  many funders have with keeping the percentage of dollars spent on overhead low.

This focus on overhead is understandable, as the percentage is a marker of “efficiency” more readily attained than other more slippery or subjective definitions of programmatic success.

Regardless, the consequences, as outlined in the article, are grim, and are tantamount to a hollowing out of  infrastructure in the nonprofit world. In closing, the authors call for a shift of focus from overhead to outcomes in the funding world.

At least one foundation has heard this call and is taking bold steps to refocus on outcomes and bolster operating support. The Boston Foundation announced recently that they will now be emphasizing “unrestricted operating support” as their primary funding strategy.

The move is being heralded by social entrepreneur Dan Pallotta as the nonprofit equivalent of “the fall of the Berlin Wall.” In addition to the shift to unrestricted funds, The Boston Foundation will be absolving grant term limits, and removing deadlines so that nonprofits can operate on their own timetables.

For more information on the Boston Foundation’s new funding strategy, read Dan Pallotta’s article in Harvard Business Publishing or visit The Boston Foundation’s website and read the press release explaining the organization’s new strategy.

-Cary Lenore Walski, MCF web communications associate

Join the Conversation: Do you see The Boston Foundation’s shift as a harbinger of a new trend in philanthropy towards increasing operating support? What other grantmakers do you know who are employing similar strategies to improve outcomes?