Cultural Competence in Site Visits and Life

May 2, 2013
guglielmoher

Rudy Guglielmo, Jr., of Youthprise and Lue Her of Otto Bremer Foundation

As part its ongoing Effective Grantmaking Series, MCF hosted Effective, Culturally Competent Site Visits.

Site visits are an excellent opportunity for foundations to connect with potential grantees and get a clearer picture of what applicants do and whom they serve. They are also a way to develop relationships, beyond the typical grantmaker/grantee dynamic.

Lissa Jones, MCF’s director of diversity, equity and inclusion, shared “Three Giant Steps to Cultural Competence.”

  1. Build your own awareness. Bias is often transferred unconsciously, so check in with yourself about your cultural biases. What, for example, did your grandfather say about the value of immigrants?  As we become aware of our biases, we can work to make more culturally-informed grantmaking decisions.
  2. Develop a way of knowing. Go to cultural events, read a community paper, check out opportunities in your neighborhood to learn about other cultures. It’s all around if you look for it!
  3. Practice, practice, practice. Develop relationships, engage in the community and realize this is a lifelong endeavor. You’ll never say, “OK, I’m done. I’ve learned it all, and now I’m culturally competent!”

Panelists for the session were program officers Rudy Guglielmo, Jr., Youthprise, and Lue Her, Otto Bremer Foundation.

youthprise

Youthprise Site Visits: Guglielmo gave examples of how to look at the sector, organizational capacity and program effectiveness with a cultural lens (put yourself in the applicant’s shoes), rather than a traditional foundation lens (develop a rationale for an investment).

A traditional lens values information veracity, research accuracy, alignment of the grantee with foundation guidelines and may involve less transparent decision-making.

A cultural lens puts cultural identity at the center of the conversation and allows for an asset-based approach with an open-ended conversation between foundation and applicant. Use of a cultural lens is not a substitute for due diligence, but it is a way to learn about an applicant in a community context. It can be an effective way to evaluate requests in areas that are traditionally hard to quantify (leadership, community organizing, youth development) and provide an opportunity to establish an ongoing relationship with a potential grantee.

Guglielmo closed with a list of learning strategies: accompany an experienced funder into the field, commit to regular visits to an organization and use the foundation’s capacity to convene and allow for peer learning. The biggest barrier to culturally competent site visits is the need to build relationships.

obf

Otto Bremer Foundation Site Visits: Her says site visits are the backbone of the Otto Bremer Foundation and a principle tenant of its work. Each visit is important in establishing or maintaining a relationship, learning about community and doing due diligence.

On Her’s first site visit with Bremer, he accompanied another program officer to “learn the ropes.” During the visit, proposal-related questions were not asked, instead the conversation focused on what was going on in the community. Trust was established and the relationship grew from there.

Culturally competent site visits are not done in isolation; they are one piece of the puzzle. Before a visit, research is done, conversations held and trust established. You have to make time to build relationships, as there is no crash course in culture.

Her ended by saying the road to cultural competence starts with one relationship, and you’re becoming culturally competent when you don’t have to think about it so much.

- Megan Sullivan, MCF operations and publications coordinator


Don’t Ask Grantseekers to Jump Through Hoops

November 5, 2012

Most grantmakers take their responsibility of supporting nonprofits seriously, and all MCF members subscribe to eight Principles for Grantmakers that guide their work and relations with nonprofits and others.

Even with the best of intentions, inefficiencies and stumbling blocks can strain interactions between grantmakers and nonprofits. The fall issue of Giving Forum offers eight grantmaking “dos” to smooth the process.

Here’s a quick preview, but don’t miss the full story. It’s online and in mailboxes now.

Publish current, precise application guidelines

The MCF Transparency Principle states that grantmakers should use clear, consistent and timely communications with constituents. Grant guidelines and deadlines should be specific, current and reflective of a funder’s priorities.

Plus, guidelines should be easy to find on the organization’s website or in a grantseeking research tool, such as Minnesota Grantmakers Online (MGO).

Provide current contact information and respond promptly to inquiries

Initial conversations between grantmakers and nonprofits save time in the long run. Personal inquiries enable nonprofits to quickly vet ideas and determine fit (or not) before they submit a proposal.

Nonprofits value clear communication and relationships above all else in their interactions with funders. Responsiveness by grantmakers is an illustration of the MCF Respectful Relationships Principle, which calls for mutual respect, candor, confidentiality and understanding.

Ask only for information required for decision-making

Grantmakers should regularly reflect on how they use information from applicants and whether the information is essential to funding decisions. Simplifying application requirements saves time for all.

And seek ways to reduce the administrative burden on grantseekers. Instead of requesting 25 copies of a paper application, employ a copy center or shift to digital review.

Read the full story, then tell us what your foundation does to make applying for a grant easier.

- Susan Stehling, MCF communications associate

Photo cc AKZOPhoto


Cultivating Cultures of Giving

April 18, 2012

A new donor challenge from MCF member W.K. Kellogg Foundation is raising money to support nonprofits around the country that address high-priority issues in communities of color.

Called Cultures of Giving, the challenge involves 22 participating nonprofits, including other MCF members and allies like Tiwahe Foundation and Hispanics in Philanthropy. It includes a dollar-for-dollar match from W.K. Kellogg Foundation for the first $20,000 raised by each nonprofit.

W.K. Kellogg Foundation is hosting this donor challenge using Razoo, the same platform used by GiveMN.org to revolutionize the culture of online giving in Minnesota. This is a great example of grantmakers leveraging new technology to advance important grantmaking principles like diversity.

This 10-day campaign ends April 26. Head on over and have a look at Cultures of Giving for yourself!


The Changing Faces of Philanthropy

January 17, 2012

A new report, Cultures of Giving, commissioned by MCF member W.K. Kellogg Foundation looks at the recent growth of identity-based philanthropy – defined this way:

A growing movement to spark philanthropic giving from a community on behalf of a community, where “community” is defined by race, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation.

The U.S. population is changing, with ethnic and racial groups growing faster than the overall population. Not surprisingly, the face of philanthropy is changing along with it.

The report found that 63 percent of Latino households now make charitable donations, and blacks give away 25 percent more of their income per year than whites.

Concurrently the definition of philanthropy is expanding to encompass contributions of any size from people of every income bracket and ethnic background. And, the report shows how these new philanthropists are pooling their money—in increasingly organized ways—for greater impact.

The report challenges funders to consider ways to collaborate:

  • by providing seed support and other forms of assistance,
  • by embracing identity-based funds as critical partners in the sector and forging stronger connections within communities of color,
  • by diversifying the leadership of mainstream philanthropy to reflect changing demographics and
  • by shifting practices to reflect what communities of color are teaching about the future of giving and how funders can positively impact the country’s most vulnerable children and families.

MCF agrees that grantmaking is most effective when grantmakers reflect the diversity of the communities they serve.

For local information on the subject, check out our 2011 Working Towards Diversity IV report, which paints a comprehensive picture of the demographics, policies and practices on diversity and inclusion of Minnesota grantmakers. Review our diversity resources, and visit the websites of our strategic partners:

It’s important work. W.K. Kellogg Foundation president and CEO Sterling Speirn puts it this way, “We believe that understanding and supporting this emerging area of philanthropy is essential for any foundation, funder or donor who wants to drive social change.”

- Susan Stehling, MCF communications associate

CC Photo: KellyCDB


Member Post: Grantmaking Transparency in the Age of YouTube

January 12, 2012

One of MCF’s Principles for Grantmakers is to be transparent in communications with the public, applicants, grantees and donors. Many foundations are now using video and social media to do just that. Naomi Pesky, director of marketing and communications at Minnesota Philanthropy Partners, shares here a recent example she’s been working on.

When planning the launch of Minnesota Philanthropy Partners, we knew creating a video about our grantmaking work was an important component. As we unveiled a new name for our network of 1,600 funds, foundations and organizations, we wanted to reassure nonprofits that the grantmaking for three of our anchor foundations,  The Saint Paul Foundation, F. R. Bigelow Foundation and Mardag Foundation, remained the same.

Video is also a great way to make our grantmaking processes more transparent. We hope that an insider peek into our practices will help nonprofits be more informed when working with us, which would then result in more powerful collaborations. Our program team wants to work closely with nonprofits. We welcome conversations with organizations to learn about their work and understand if their programs and objectives fit with our funding priorities and commitments.

Ultimately, this new grantmaking video, along with other communication efforts like our Nonprofits to KnowTM  video series and MNSights magazine, is intended to help strengthen philanthropy in Minnesota. We hope the outcome of the new video is that more great programs find our foundations and that our community is the better for it. Have a look and let us know what you think!


Diversity and the False Choice

December 21, 2011

I recently came across this article on making diversity more meaningful, courtesy of a referral from Rosetta Thurman’s blog. It packs a lot of good thoughts into a few pages, but here’s one thing that especially stood out to me:

[Economics professor Scott Page] made a remarkable discovery, subsequently elaborated in his 2007 book, The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Not only did diverse teams comprising members who each thought differently about the problem outperform less diverse teams, but they often did so even when the less diverse teams had better individual problem-solvers as members. As Page concluded, diversity trumps ability.

This struck a chord for me because it can be so easy to think of diversity as a laudable goal, but one that competes with other priorities instead of supporting them. We can hire the most qualified candidate, or we can hire one that will make us more diverse. We can take some time to do a diversity training, or we can get that work done that’s piling up our desks.

The research mentioned above is a powerful reminder to me that these are false choices. Increasing diversity in an organization is a plus for job candidates precisely because it can make them the best choices, by adding new perspectives and experiences that wouldn’t occur to a more homogenous group. An organizational focus on diversity is valuable because it produces better results, by getting us all to consider those different perspectives and inform our work through them.

If you appreciate those reminders about the value of diversity like I do, I encourage you to give the full thing a read. MCF is committed to the principle of diversity in philanthropy, and released a Diversity and Inclusion Action Kit for grantmakers earlier this year.

On a related note, I was glad to see an announcement this week about monthly Diversity and Inclusion Networking Lunches, sponsored by the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits and Charities Review Council, and hosted by a variety of organizations doing good work on this issue in our community.

-Chris Oien, MCF web communications associate


Arts Giving Needs to Contribute More to the Common Good

November 8, 2011

For those of you who have been following our recent article on 2009 arts giving trends, you know that arts giving in 2009 in Minnesota fell to its lowest level since 2003, but there is hope on a national level for a rebound in 2011. According to the article Arts Giving is Up, But Hold the Applause by Joel Rose from National Public Radio, charitable giving for the arts was up 5% so far in 2011. The star example of this mini renaissance is the Metropolitan Opera which had a fifty percent increase in donations this year, a record campaign bringing in over $182 million dollars.

What does the “hold the applause” refer to? The majority of money given went to serve audiences that are whiter and wealthier than the American average, and to large organizations that primarily serve Western European culture, like opera houses, art museums and classical music groups. The majority of foundations give to arts organizations with yearly budgets exceeding $5 million.

Now, I personally love the Minnesota Opera and would be thrilled to see it also have a blockbuster fundraising year, and as an individual I have every right to support what fits my tastes. But what about large grantmaking organizations? What obligations do they have to ensure an equitable, inclusive and diversified field of grantees get funding?

One solution to increasing the diversity in arts grantmaking may be to make grants available tailored to the needs and capabilities of small arts organizations, which tend to be more diverse.  Some grantmakers already offer small grants to promote community art and multi-cultural or ethnic art initiatives. At MCF member The St. Paul Foundation, the Asian Pacific Endowment specializes in funding community-based organizations and informal grassroots groups with budgets under $500,000. In 2010, this endowment funded projects that used culture, including the arts, to address social issues that affect the Asian Pacific Islander community in Minnesota. One example of the grant projects that the Asian Pacific Endowment funded is the Bon Odori pictured above, performed annually at the Japanese Lantern Lighting Festival in Como Park. Initiatives like the Asian Pacific Endowment are first steps towards ensuring that arts funding in Minnesota diversifies, truly serving the common good.

- Kaitlin Ostlie, MCF administrative assistant

Photo courtesy of the Japan America Society of Minnesota


Learning When There’s No Time To Learn

June 10, 2011

How do you make time to learn when your e-mail box is overflowing and your to do list is ever growing? It’s a problem for everyone, including those who work in the field of philanthropy.

GrantCraft asked their readers how they think about time and how they manage it. More than 1,400 of their subscribers replied. Their general consensus was:

What matters is how people use time to learn and make sense of learning, individually and across a team or organization.

As one respondent put it, “Work never ends, and so we need to learn to manage our time to include learning on the job.”

Four lessons came out of the survey. Each is listed below with one reply illustrating how a respondent incorporates the lesson into their everyday work.

Lesson 1: Establish a culture of learning by building learning into routine processes.

Build in opportunities for learning as you go. Sometimes there isn’t time to do a long reflection process at the end of a project, but there can surely be steps along the way where everyone takes time to observe the knowledge exchange that is happening.

Lesson 2: Raise the profile of learning by noticing when it happens and naming it explicitly.

Start and end meetings with questions like, ‘If there’s one thing you’d like to say to others doing a similar thing, what would it be?’ – in other words, quick things that force people to be analytical.

Lesson 3: Cultivate personal habits of learning that work for you.

I drive to site visits a lot, so I use the time to reflect and think about ideas to explore when the pace allows. It may be a small thing, but turning off the radio and focusing thought on the work can be useful.

Lesson 4: Try new activities – but choose wisely and keep things simple.

Time is always a challenge. To help overcome it, we institutionalized some set-aside time for learning. For instance, we have a monthly book club-like discussion group session with recommended readings and discussion guides…

Find out much more about these and other ideas for learning when there’s no time to learn in the four-page survey summary from GrantCraft. 

Photo CC Dalo_Pix2

- Susan Stehling, Minnesota Council on Foundations


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,445 other followers