Initiative Foundation Meetings to Cover New Grants, Training Opportunities

January 28, 2010

Do you work for a central Minnesota nonprofit, faith-based organization or community group that serves displaced workers and distressed families? The Initiative Foundation is offering new funding and training to support organizational planning and development.

Funded in part by a $1M grant from the U.S. Department of Health, the foundation’s Strengthening Communities Initiative was created to increase the long-term effectiveness and sustainability of nonprofits as they help address economic recovery issues.

More than 80 nonprofits will receive training, technical assistance and grants of up to $15,000 to support economic recovery and poverty-reduction efforts, such as helping people secure and retain employment, earn higher wages, and access government benefits and tax credits.

To learn more, attend one of three identical informational sessions:

  • February 3 – (8-10:30 a.m.) at Lakes and Pines Community Action Council, Mora
  • February 3 –  (12:30-3 p.m.) at St. Cloud Library, Bremer Room
  • February 5 – (9-11:30 a.m.) at Bremer Bank, Campbell Room, downtown Brainerd

Pre-registration is not required. For more information visit www.ifound.org or contact Tricia at tholig@ifound.org, 320-631-2003.


Economic Crisis Yields Challenges and Opportunities for Grantmakers

January 26, 2010

A year ago, as the economic turmoil was unfurling, looming questions of “How bad?” and “How long?” were top of mind. As we enter a new economic reality, grantmakers acknowledge that we won’t be returning to business as usual; we have to do our work differently.

How each grantmaker chooses to work “differently” is as varied as the number of foundations and corporate giving programs. Peter C. Hutchinson, Bush Foundation president, recently wrote about the challenges facing his organization: “Like others, we are pulled in competing directions. We want to do the right thing, but there are many right things we could do…The question is: Which right things are right for us?”

In our winter issue of Giving Forum, we highlight several foundations and how they’ve chosen to address the challenge of finding and then focusing on what’s the “right thing” for them to do during these tough times:

The Bush Foundation is keeping its sights on longstanding aspirations and its Goals for a Decade. Explains C. Scott Cooper, director of engagement and communication: “We have decided that the role we need to be playing in this economy is not to react to new problems, but to stay focused on the issues that we think are important – which are the same issues that were important to us before the recession – and to be held accountable for outcomes.”

The W.K. Kellogg Foundation, in the midst of developing a strategic framework when the recession hit, stepped back to look for new answers. “Our big ‘a-ha’ came when we decided that – as we sat here in Battle Creek, Mich., where the bottom has repeatedly fallen out of the job market – we needed new answers to grow the economy and to bring into our workforce development perspective entrepreneurship skills and the mindset and tenacity that go with them,” recalls Anne Mosle, vice president for programs.

The Minneapolis Foundation partnered with its donors to establish a Crisis Assistance Fund to assist individuals and families with food, heat and housing, and it matched additional funding from donor-advised funds to support workforce development, education, housing and other human and social service agencies.

The McKnight Foundation is maintaining its long-term focus to fight catastrophic climate change, among other priorities. “There is often a tension between responding to changing times and remaining focused on long-term goals, addressing the most critical issues with appropriate resources, urgency and creativity,” acknowledges President Kate Wolford. Over the course of 2009, Wolford reports that the McKnight board “sharpened our strategic focus in several priority areas, including accelerating the shift to a low-carbon economy, improving third grade literacy in the metro area, and implementing place-based strategies to increase opportunities for low-income residents.”

Land O’Lakes Foundation, in the enviable position of experiencing added funding due to the company’s record growth, launched its Feeding Our Communities initiative. “We looked at who owns us – we’re a cooperative owned by farmers,” explains Lydia Botham, executive director. “And, we looked at rising needs: people who never had to go to a food shelf before who now just can’t make ends meet. We felt that more needed to be done to address hunger, especially in rural areas, where it is somewhat hidden, but just as great as it is in urban communities. Feeding Our Communities is taking our ongoing support of hunger issues to a much higher level, using our expertise and resources locally, nationally and globally.”

Foundations’ responses to the hardships created by the economic downturn are not limited to decisions on funding priorities and strategic plans. Like the nonprofits they support, many also face tough administrative and operational choices. The wellbeing of nonprofits is always top of mind, though. For example, at the McKnight Foundation, “When looking at administrative reductions, a key goal was to minimize any negative impact on grantees,” Wolford says.

Articles in Giving Forum also address funders’ perspectives on the state budget plight, the advent of federal stimulus dollars and where they believe all this turmoil is leading.

- Chris Murakami Noonan, MCF communications associate


Best Tool to Chart a Course in Stormy Waters: A Foundation’s Internal Compass

January 25, 2010

The challenges posed by the economic downturn and subsequent slow-motion rebound have led foundations of all types, sizes and missions to pause and ask tough questions to determine their direction in the months and perhaps years ahead.

To help foundations navigate what, for many, are uncharted waters, their boards and executive leadership must take a long look inward. Relying too heavily for direction on resources and circumstances external to the foundation may pull the organization off course.

Our winter issue of the Giving Forum, which will be available online tomorrow, includes examples of several foundations that are relying on their own histories and values as guides.

The work of the Otto Bremer Foundation during the economic crisis has been guided by a consistent theme: What would Otto Bremer do? “Our trustees feel that people are in such desperate situations now,” explains Randi Ilyse Roth, the foundation’s executive director. “When the trustees look back and think about what our founder would do, they know he would help people through times like this and hope that the work we support helps them get back on their feet.”

The foundation introduced the Bremer Emergency Fund, a joint response of the foundation and the Bremer banks. “This was about getting cash into the hands of people who needed it immediately to pay rent, buy food, heat their homes,” Roth says.

In an additional shift last year, the foundation specified that all of its funding targeting the Twin Cities would focus on poverty relief. “This wasn’t an easy change. Some of the longer-term work that also would have a positive impact on society – work that is good and important too – is not getting funded.

“There’s no real right answer,” reflects Roth, “which is why the trustees often turn to what they believe would be our founder’s intent.”

Kerrie Blevins, foundation director of the Patrick and Aimee Butler Family Foundation and vice president of Private Philanthropy Services, defines this inward look at missions, values and histories to shape direction as “values-based giving.”

In this issue of Giving Forum, Blevins authored an article describing the values-based giving decisions of three foundations with which she works:

  • The Patrick and Aimee Butler Family Foundation board decided that, in keeping with its values and decades-long commitment to providing general operating support for nonprofit organizations, it would continue making two-year gen op grants in 2009 and 2010, recognizing that nonprofits need a stable base of support now more than ever.
  • The James R. Thorpe Foundation, which regards itself as a relationship-based funder, elected to deepen those relationships by hosting a convening of youth grantee partners representing diverse disciplines, including the arts, education and human services. Grantees discussed the opportunities and challenges they’re facing, giving the board a deeper understanding of the issues confronting these nonprofits.
  • The Laura Jane Musser Fund has long supported the arts and the environment in rural communities. Aware that many foundations were moving away from supporting these in an effort to respond to mounting basic human needs, the Musser Fund directors elected to “stay the course” with its focus, recognizing that their grantmaking is responsive and community-based and that it supports the sustainability and vitality of rural communities.

Join the conversation: Share your examples of foundations and giving programs that have chosen to chart a new course, stay the course or a combination of both after checking their internal compass during this economic crisis.

- Chris Murakami Noonan, MCF communications associate


What Does Grantmakers’ 2010 Funding Outlook Mean for Minnesota Nonprofits?

January 12, 2010

Last Thursday MCF released its 2010 Outlook Report, based on survey results from 125 of Minnesota’s largest grantmakers representing 70 percent of all grant dollars in the state. If you’d like the opportunity to delve deeper into what the findings might mean for your organization, we invite you to register for the upcoming 2010 Funding Outlook for Minnesota Grantmakers and Nonprofits program on Friday, January 29. The session will begin at 8:45 am with registration and time for networking over light refreshments and end at 11:45 am.

Open to the public, this program will start with an overview of the report given by Bill King, MCF president,  followed by a panel discussion titled “Looking Ahead — with Optimism and Creativity” featuring four leaders from major grantmaking organizations in the state of Minnesota.

The panelists will include:

For more information and to register for the program, please visit the MCF website.


How Have Federal Stimulus Dollars Affected Your Work?

January 11, 2010

Some unknowns came and went during 2009, while others still prevail in 2010. Nonprofits and grantmakers alike are navigating uncharted waters, knowing that they probably aren’t going to return to the same point they were at in the fall of 2008.

The advent of federal stimulus dollars is one such “unknown.” It wasn’t on anyone’s horizon before the economic downturn, and now it makes the news on an almost daily basis. While the professional and official research is being conducted on the affect of federal stimulus money, I’m interested to find out anecdotally what the affect has been on your nonprofit or your foundation.

Perhaps you’ve received funding or you’re considering applying.  Maybe you’ve spent time researching the options. Perhaps you and your colleagues have discussed what the advent of federal stimulus money means for the nonprofit sector, social services, employment, your grant program, the initiative’s you’re considering.

Join the Conversation: How has the advent of federal stimulus funding affected your work? What kinds of discussions have you had with your colleagues about how these dollars might impact your work, the work of your partners, the ability of communities to meet the needs of they’re citizens?

If you’re interested in the numbers…

In doing some prep work for MCF’s upcoming Giving Forum, which will focus on grantmakers and their responses during the economic crisis, I spent some time looking at some websites that contain an abundance of information. You might find them interesting too.

Recovery.gov was created as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and is the official website maintained by the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board.

On the “Track the Money” section of the site, you can access lists of Recovery Act spending recipients by using the pull-down menu to select “Minnesota.” View grant, loan and contract recipients, award amounts and overseeing agencies.

The State of Minnesota’s coordination of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act efforts is managed by the office of Minnesota Management and Budget. It also has a website, recovery.mn.

- Chris Murakami Noonan, MCF communications associate


Grantmaking in Minnesota Estimated to Decline Slightly in 2010

January 7, 2010

MCF 2010 Outlook ReportThe Minnesota Council on Foundations (MCF) releases its 2010 Outlook Report today, which finds that overall giving is estimated to decline for the second year in a row. Some indicators, however, signal that grantmakers are less pessimistic about their giving in 2010 than they were at this time last year.

  • Giving by grantmakers in Minnesota is estimated to decrease by approximately 1 percent in 2010 compared to 2009;  a year ago, grantmaking was estimated to decline by 4 percent in 2009 from 2008.
  • Thirty percent of grantmakers expect to give less in 2010, while 25 percent expect to give more. This is an improvement over expectations captured last year, in MCF’s 2009 Outlook Report, when 40 percent expected decreases and only 15 percent expected increases.
  • Of those grantmakers with assets, 58 percent expect them to increase in 2010, and 8 percent anticipate a decrease. A year ago, just 13 percent of grantmakers expected their assets to increase in 2009, while 52 percent anticipated a decrease.

“2009 was such a tumultuous and uncertain year for nonprofits and grantmakers, so these subtle yet positive changes are encouraging,” notes Bill King, MCF president. “But these indicators really reflect less pessimism rather than true optimism for the coming year. The outlook for grantmakers and the nonprofit community remains challenging.”

Other key findings in the report:

  • Twenty percent of grantmakers expect to decrease the number of grants they make in 2010, and 10 percent expect to decrease the sizes of grants awarded.
  • Among all types of grantmakers, corporate foundations and giving programs are most likely to expect their 2010 giving to remain the same as 2009.
  • Seventy percent of grantmakers report they currently are providing some kind of assistance to those affected by the economic downturn. Basic needs – food, housing and jobs – are the areas these grantmakers are mostly likely to support.
  • Grantmakers express concern about the well-being of their nonprofit partners, which are under significant programmatic and financial strains resulting from increased demands for services and decreased resources.

To explore what these findings mean for the philanthropic and nonprofit sectors in the coming year, MCF will host “2010 Funding Outlook for Minnesota Grantmakers and Nonprofits” on Friday, Jan. 29, 8:45 to 11:45 am, at Neighborhood House at Wellstone Center, St. Paul.


Happy New Year(-End Giving)!

December 28, 2009

I’m sure your mailbox has been like mine these past few weeks – plenty of letters soliciting year-end financial contributions mixed in with the holiday greetings. The challenge has always been how to sift through all this and make the decisions to give to some causes and not to others.

Champagne

Before you uncork a bottle of bubbly on New Year's Eve, will you be making any last minute donations?

How is the tough year affecting your year-end giving? Do we choose to support nonprofits that address hunger and housing? How about organizations that are filling a need created by government budget cuts such as those providing education or medical care and support to those who struggle to afford it?

Or do we support those nonprofits that may have experienced a drop in giving this year (like arts groups, for example), because a good base of their support now is being directed toward basic needs and they are not perceived as such? Do we support dire needs in our own zip code, state, country or across the ocean?

In this economic climate, difficult choices are coupled with our own decisions about how much we’re capable of spending, giving away and saving.

Given the amount of mail I’ve received (via the regular postal service and via email) now is a time of great need for the causes I support (as well as for those for which I’m not sure how I got on their distribution list).

Working in the nonprofit field, I tend to view fundraising appeals through a somewhat more critical lens, thinking about messaging, impact and other nuances.

A couple of recent articles caught my attention. In his monthly e-newsletter free-range thinking, Andy Goodman recounts a study conducted in 2007 at Carnegie Mellon University in which researchers studied the giving of students who received appeals using data alone to illustrate need, a personal story alone outlining need, and data plus story. The results in a nutshell: Story alone is a more effective appeal than data alone and surprisingly, data plus story.

A New York Times article recently touted Dec. 31 as the “most lucrative” day of the year for many nonprofits, especially those that solicit online giving. Nonprofits, the article says, are increasingly using a last-minute email appeal to entice people to take advantage of any tax benefits for giving during the preceding year.

Join the conversation: Has your mailbox seen more, less or about the same amount of fundraising mail this season? Which appeals do you find most impactful? Any examples you’d like to share? What’s your experience with New Year’s Eve giving? How much giving do you do then? Or, if you’re a nonprofit, is that a “lucrative day” for you?

- Chris Murakami Noonan, MCF communications associate

Image CC Oskay