What I Wish I Knew . . . with Trista Harris

June 30, 2010

Trista Harris, Executive Director of the Headwaters Foundation for Justice, thought she was going to run a nonprofit organization after graduate school, but her mentors gave her some great advice that changed the path of Trista’s career.  In this “What I Wish I Knew . . .” video, Trista explains how her advisor from the Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs suggested that she take her interests in nonprofit capacity building to philanthropy, where she could spread her insight and energy to multiple organizations.

Trista says that affinity groups have been incredibly important to her professional development, as have resources from groups like GrantCraft.  But, she says one of the most important things to remember when taking a position in the field is that ” you didn’t get smarter, prettier, or funnier” when you started working for a foundation.  Trista says there are two ways to approach the work: you can either be a steward of community resources or you can act like you’ve won the lottery.  Trista encourages grantmakers to approach the work with humility and honesty for greater effectiveness.  Thanks, Trista!

View other videos in our “What I Wish I Knew . . .” series:

  • Ellis Bullock
  • Claire Chang
  • Jeneen Hartley Sago
  • Joan Cleary
  • Patrick Troska
  • - Stephanie Jacobs, MCF director of member services


    Don’t Close the Achievement Gap, Prevent It

    June 29, 2010

    In recent years, I’ve heard a lot about efforts to close the achievement gap, a national embarrassment that is especially evident in Minnesota.

    Last week I attended “Window of Opportunity: Babies Can’t Wait, The 4th Annual Nancy Latimer Convening for Children and Youth” co-sponsored by the Minnesota Early Childhood Funders Network and the Minnesota Council on Foundations. Evidence presented there was clear – poor children (and their families) need services and intervention, long before the children enter school, to ensure an achievement gap doesn’t start.

    Dr. Richard Chase of Wilder Research puts it this way, “We have to stop talking about how to close the achievement gap. We have to think about how to prevent the achievement gap.”

    Chase talked about the necessity of multiple, coordinated services to achieve this and defined three essentials that very young children need to thrive:

    • A caring and responsive caregiver
    • A language-rich environment
    • Opportunities to safely explore

    In our state, 15 to 20 percent of our babies are vulnerable. Their families live in poverty, increasing the risk that they simply won’t get what they need to succeed. In 2008, 60 percent of American Indian babies in Minnesota were born into poverty, 42 percent of African American, 33 percent of Hispanic, 10 percent of Asian, and 8 percent of white babies. Low-income children of color make up a growing portion of Minnesota’s babies today and of Minnesota’s students and workforce tomorrow. Their success matters.

    Dr. Megan Gunnar, a professor at the University of Minnesota’s Institute of Child Development also spoke. She introduced the theory of “serve and return,” a continual process of the child “serving something out” and how, in a responsive environment, their “serve is returned.”

    This high stakes game doesn’t happen on a tennis court. Instead, imagine a baby smiling and cooing at mom and then waiting for a smile or encouraging word to come back. If she doesn’t get a response, she tries less and less often, and ultimately her brain development slows. An unresponsive environment just doesn’t provide what a child needs.

    Why the lack of response? Caregivers in low-income families are depressed or emotionally stressed 15 to 20 percent of the time, rendering them ineffective at the all important “serve and return.” Lack of access to affordable mental health care and other services exacerbates the problem.

    For both speakers, the answer is clear. Increase funding for the whole child, the whole family and the whole community and do it now.

    Chase summarized, “Close the gap between what science is telling us and what we do. Investing in early childhood gives us the biggest bang for our buck. It’s certainly a better investment than stadiums or airlines.”

    Awards Presented
    This year’s “Nancy” awards, presented in honor of Nancy Latimer, went to Jane Kretzmann, senior program officer at the Minnesota Community Foundation (an MCF member) for her work promoting the healthy development of young children, including development of the Project for Babies, and Arthur J. Rolnick, economist, senior vice president and director of research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis for showing the link between early childhood education and healthy communities and economies.

    - Susan Stehling, MCF



    Kitchen Table Philanthropy Involving the Whole Family

    June 25, 2010

    The following article is taken from West Central Initiative’s quarterly newsletter Focus on the Region. Thanks to WCI for letting us share this article on the blog!

    The next time your family comes together for a day at the lake or a barbecue in the backyard, why not take an hour to discuss your estate and how your family can make an impact on the things that are most meaningful to all of you?

    To help you start the discussion, here are some topics and questions to post to your “kitchen table philanthropists”:

    1.) First, let your family know that including charitable giving in your estate does not mean leaving out children, grandchildren and other family members. Including charities in your planning can actually enhance what your loved ones will inherit. Because your family is important to you their input into how those charitable dollars are spent and what organizations they will support is also important to you.

    2.) Encourage your family to talk about the charitable organizations they currently support. Ask each about the most satisfying charitable gift that they have made. Other questions could include:

      • Do you see your family as a family who “gives back”? How do you feel about that?
      • Are local issues and organizations more important to your family than national or international organizations?
      • Are there projects or organizations you would like the family’s name linked with?
      • What would the family like to see accomplished through charitable giving?

      Including your loved ones in these discussions can provide multiple benefits. It gives them a role in your decision making. They will understand what you want to do and how you want to do it. It should also ensure that there will be no surprises for the family at the time your estate is settled.

      If you’d like to explore opportunities for planned giving, get in touch with the Minnesota Planned Giving Council. Or, if you’re a Minnesota resident living in the west central region, you may call Kim Embretson or Tom McSparron of the West Central Initiative at 800.735.2239.

      More about WCI: The West Central Initiative serves to improve west central Minnesota through funding, programs and technical assistance. Their vision is to unite ideas and resources to help people and communities create a better tomorrow. To learn more about WCI, visit their website at wcif.org. WCI is a member of Minnesota Council on Foundations.


      What Difference Does Difference Make?

      June 24, 2010

      Difference is everywhere I look. I see difference in size, shape, gender, race, perspective, background, locale, income, wealth, achievement, commitment, attitude, and age to name a few. I see difference. This difference and the work I do each day prompt me to ask myself, and now you, when does difference make a difference? When I ask myself this question in relation to my own life I’m forced to dissect the answer into the types of difference that I experience and present each time I show-up in the world.

      The truth is, difference makes a difference quite often, but the extent to which it makes a positive or negative difference depends on the situation. There are times in my life when being the youngest in the organization or board made the biggest difference. At other times, it has been being the only person of color in the room. Still others it’s been being the only woman, or the only person from another state, or the only person in a certain socioeconomic class. Most recently, it seems that being a new Minnesota transplant is making the biggest difference in my life. It seems difference is always making a difference…So, what do we do about it?

      Years ago, in our efforts to create a color-blind, gender-blind society, we worked to erase difference. Women wore pants, took manufacturing jobs, cut their hair short and used other tactics in order to fit in. People of color in majority environments changed the way they spoke, dressed, and styled their hair to avoid seeming different. And Caucasians in urban environments did the same again, in order to fit in.

      Sometimes individuals made these changes because of perceived ism’s, and sometimes the changes were mandated. Looking back on it, we realize these changes did very little to erase difference. In fact, they perpetuated the fallacy that the only real differences were in superficial things such as clothing, hair, and dialect, overshadowing the rich and vibrant differences that actually make us who we are and contribute to stronger communities and organizations.

      Today, we’re starting to realize that difference can make a positive difference, if we allow it to. Diversity of thought is a valuable asset for every organization, and when we realize that diversity of thought comes from not only diversity of educational background and experience, but also diversity in gender, race, class, geographic background, sexual orientation, age and other facets of identity, we realize that our organizations can be much more successful when we are inclusive of all of these differences.
      But, even at that point of awareness, it takes more than an open door. I’m a member of a membership based organization with over 600 members, and yet less than 2% of members were people of color. Even fewer members come from low or low-to-middle income backgrounds.

      The organization has an “Outreach Statement” that essentially stands as a no discrimination policy and for years the organization relied on this policy to invite and welcome in members from diverse racial backgrounds. When this noble outcome wasn’t achieved, leaders decided that women from other races were simply not interested in joining, when in fact; the perception was that that women of other races were not allowed to join.

      I assert that until the organization is actively assessing why it has not been perceived as welcoming of certain differences and made concerted efforts to thoroughly reach-out to new segments, this outreach statement should actually be called an “Open to Considering” statement.

      I don’t doubt that many of our philanthropic organizations also struggle with acknowledging difference in ways that translate into inclusive practices. Successful organizations must be places where difference is allowed to thrive.

      Organizational leaders must become experts at engaging all types of people and differences and at leveraging those differences for greater organizational impact. When we master this, everyone in the organization can bring their lens to the work, and we begin to see we’re all better for it. But, it’s not easy. What differences make a difference in your day-to-day work? What about in your neighborhood? What are you doing to make difference make a positive difference in your organization?

      - Tawanna Black, MCF diversity fellow

      Tawanna Black

      Tawanna Black supports the inclusivity initiatives of MCF and its members. As a part of her fellowship, Tawanna will be sharing her insights with us on the topics of diversity and inclusion in the field of philanthropy in her bi-monthly blog posts. Stay tuned for future posts!


      What I Wish I Knew . . . with Patrick Troska

      June 23, 2010

      In this “What I Wish I Knew…” video, Patrick Troska from The Jay and Rose Phillips Family Foundation says that he feels like a dinosaur in the field.  Yes, Patrick has been in the field of philanthropy for a while now, but no one would call him or his grantmaking philosophy out of date.  He has taken what he’s learned from his mentors and adapted his approach to make sure his work at the foundation is relevant and aligned with community needs.

      Patrick says there is no road map to working in the field.  He was working in nonprofits when he claims he was “at the right place at the right time.”  He believes finding a position in grantmaking is less about following a career path that leads you to a position, and more about timing, connection, skills, and fit with the organizational culture.

      Patrick says that he wishes he would have known that the field was in the process of changing.  By this, he means the trend in the philanthropic sector of moving away from responding to needs and instead focusing on measuring impact, which he feels can be illusive.  Patrick’s mentor, Pat Cummings, used to say that foundations should allow the path to be developed and then lay the sidewalk.  He feels that today’s grantmakers “first lay the sidewalk and then wait to see if people walk on it.”

      Patrick received some great advice from Pat Cummings when he started in the field ten years ago:

      • Remember that it’s not your money,
      • Don’t believe the praise, and
      • Don’t take the work home with you.

      Patrick offers his own advice as well, reminding us that “grantmakers without grantees is like the sound of one hand clapping.”  He says that once we lose sight of the fact that we need each other, we’ve been in the field too long.  Thanks, Patrick!

      View other videos in our “What I Wish I Knew . . .” series:


      Creativity After 40? Bush Grantees, Research Show in Some Fields the Best Work Happens Later in Life

      June 21, 2010

      The Bush Foundation, an MCF member, recently announced the 2010 recipients of their Enduring Vision Awards. Unique in the United States, the award of $100,000 is given annually to three artists in Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota who have at least 25 years of continued work. The grant provides support during a time of life when artists are often most productive, yet least supported by grantmakers.

      A study recently noted by science writer Jonah Lehrer, and picked up in an article at MinnPost.com, shows that the Bush Foundation might just be on to something here. According to Dean Simonton, psychologist at UC-Davis, there’s an interesting inverted “U-curve” pattern that appears when you graph the age at which people are most creative across a number of disciplines. The peak of that U-curve occurs at different ages depending on the type of work.

      Creative breakthroughs in fields like physics and poetry, for instance, tend to happen most commonly when individuals are in their late twenties. Crafts that have fundamentals that are loosely defined,  and therefore require repetition and refinement, however, tend to peak later. Novelists and biologists tend to reach the zenith of their creative ability in their late forties.

      The work of Lakota visual artist Arthur D. Amiotte, Laotian textile artist Bounxou Daoheuang Chanthraphone and European American photographer Paul Shambroom, the 2010 Enduring Vision recipients, seem to show that this trend towards better work later in life occurs in the visual arts as well.

      You can learn more about the Enduring Vision award, and past grantees at the Bush Fellows website. Or if you’d like to see a list of many other artists who produced their best work at forty and beyond, read Susan Perry’s article at MinnPost.com.

      - Cary Lenore Walski, MCF web communications associate


      Women’s Status: Less Money, Poorer Health, Other Inequities

      June 17, 2010

      The Women’s Foundation of Minnesota released today its 2010 research report on the status of women and girls in Minnesota.  The news is not uplifting.

      According to the report, women are shortchanged in four critical areas — economics, safety, health and leadership.  And, while all women and girls in Minnesota suffer inequalities, even greater disparities exist for women of color, rural women and older women in Minnesota.

      Here are just a few of the findings:

      • Economics: Because of the gender wage gap, a Minnesota woman (and her family)  earns an average of $11,000 less per year, or $1 million less over a lifetime. White, African American and Latina women earn 76, 61, and 56 cents on the dollar, respectively, compared to white men.
      • Safety: By mid-life, one-third of Minnesota women have experienced a rape crime.  Violence at home is the second leading cause of homelessness among Minnesota women.
      • Health: Native American women in Minnesota are 10% more likely to be diagnosed with cancer than their white counterparts, but 58% more likely to die from it.  While African-American women are 8% less likely than white women to get cancer, they are 15% more likely to die from the disease.
      • Leadership: Only 34% of Minnesota state legislators are women, and the number of women candidates is declining.  No women lead any of the Fortune 500 companies in the state.

      What Can You Do?
      The full report, “Status of Women & Girls in Minnesota,” contains much more detail, including “What You Can Do In 30 Minutes or Less” recommendations for individuals to take action to address inequities.

      In releasing the report today, Lee Roper-Batker, president and CEO of the foundation,  encouraged women, girls and all community members to use the findings to jump-start social change.  She emphasized:  ”Research without action is pointless.”

      Next week Women’s Foundation staff members will launch the 2010 “Road to Equality Tour,” sharing the research and obtaining community input in Warroad, Moorhead, Grand Rapids, Duluth, Willmar, St. Cloud and Rochester.

      Research and writing for the report was conducted by the University of MN Humphrey Institute’s Center on Women & Public Partnership.  More than 100 experts from academia, government, nonprofit and private sectors, elected bodies and philanthropy participated in working groups to review data, identify key issues and proffer solutions.


      Follow

      Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

      Join 1,418 other followers