Results-Only … and Principled … Philanthropy

June 4, 2008

Clocks
Photo by Flickr user Leo Reynolds

No doubt you’ve heard about the new book Why Work Sucks and How to Fix It. The publisher’s publicity machine has gained lots of coverage in the Twin Cities, from the Star Tribune article last Sunday, to an hour-long session with authors Cali Ressler and Jody Thompson on MPR’s Midmorning on Monday, to a feature on Channel 4 during Monday’s 10 o’clock news.

Work Sucks bookI’ve not yet read the book, but I’m not surprised by all the buzz. The concept, developed at local corporation Best Buy (an MCF member), completely dismisses our old notions of work time and work space. According to the authors, we can throw the time clock out the window and forget about work as a place you go. Instead, we should embrace ROWE, the “Results-Only Work Environment,” in which employees work whenever and wherever they want and as little as they want — as long as they deliver results and get the job done.

I wonder why ROWE works. While outcomes are what are measured, the concept’s success is probably not results-only. It must also be about values and principles — trusting and respecting your coworkers, communicating clearly and transparently, behaving ethically, etc.

MCF Principles for GrantmakersIn philanthropy we talk a lot about results, too, such as when we ask nonprofits to be accountable and report on grant outcomes. But underpinning all our work as philanthropists are fundamental beliefs about charitable giving and strengthening our communities. To join MCF, our members must subscribe to our Principles for Grantmakers. Among these principles are ethics, respectful relationships, transparency, and self-assessment. Sound familiar?

Join the conversation: Are you ready to embrace new ways of working? How are your personal and professional values demonstrated in the workplace? Which of the MCF Principles for Grantmakers help you achieve more remarkable results?


California Senate Hearing on A.B.624

June 4, 2008

From a Council on Foundations Legislative Alert:

On May 12, the California Senate Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee (BP&ED) held a hearing on A.B.624, a bill that would require foundations with assets greater than $250 million to collect ethnic and gender data related to their governance and grantmaking practices. With very good representation from foundations in the room, opponents of A.B.624 testified that:

  1. the legislation is based on faulty report/data
  2. the bill may be unconstitutional
  3. the bill might discourage individual donors (with the Philanthropy Roundtable testifying that the bill has the potential to drive $23 billion in charitable giving out of CA)
  4. the bill doesn’t address core issues of diversity and transparency of such
  5. slippery slope (where does it end?)
  6. philanthropy is not the place to address the shortcomings of government

Those testifying in favor of A.B.624 argued that:

  1. taxpayers need to know how their money is spent
  2. small organizations do not benefit from foundation funding
  3. grantees are already required to report this information to government/foundations
  4. minorities and minority-run organizations need the money

The chairman of the committee did not ask for a vote on the bill and instead asked the foundations in the room to work with the authors of the legislation to determine amenable legislation to both sides, with the hope that the BP&ED Committee can vote on this new legislation by the middle of June.

More information about A.B.624:

Editorials/opinions about A.B.624:


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,428 other followers