Is CSR a “PR sham”?

February 20, 2008

A post on the Harvard Business Conversation Starter says that the notion of corporate social responsibility will begin to disappear in 2008. The authors of Authenticity: What Consumers Really Want, Joseph Pine and James Gilmore, argue that “CSR will be seen for the sham that it is”:

Consumers will increasingly flock to enterprises that offer transformational change as the very substance of its offerings — be it in the form of vocational tourism, personal interventions, or even narcithropic giving — and reject initiatives that merely front as the means to sell more wares. Consumer dollars will flow less to promotional programs like (PRODUCT)Red and more to fully dedicated ventures like micro-lending site kiva.org.

In response, Financial Times associate editor/columnist Michael Skapinker writes:

…engaging with the community in the pursuit of profit has its place: indeed, it is essential. Companies cannot thrive in collapsing societies. Without political stability, the future of business is grim: look at Kenya or, worse, Zimbabwe. Stability has many components, but prosperity is one of the most important. The more people have to lose, the greater their interest in social peace. For companies, supporting education, entrepreneurs and good nutrition is more than philanthropy: it is money well spent.

UPS Foundation president Lisa Hamilton writes in Forbes:

Whether a business volunteers to act socially responsible, or if it is pushed to do so by outside forces, these actions or inactions can become defining traits of a company and can greatly impact the relationships it has with its stakeholders.

And Beyond Philanthropy says:

…are companies more profitable because of CSR or is CSR encouraged by greater profits? Either way, the question will eventually become moot, because if the mid-term shows that companies with CSR programs indeed have greater profits, everyone will launch CSR initiatives and thus precipitate the demise of CSR as a competitive differentiator. In short, companies should not engage in CSR in a quest for profits.

Join the conversation: What’s your take? Is CSR a thing of the past, or will it remain an important piece of a corporation’s strategy?


A Budget Squeeze Hits Charities

February 19, 2008

CapitolThe Chronicle of Philanthropy reports:

Charities and advocacy groups face another year of budget battles as President Bush continues his efforts to squeeze spending on social services, arts, health care, and other domestic programs at a time when many states are threatening cuts of their own.

Read more on this topic in the Philanthropy Journal blog.

Join the conversation: Has your foundation or nonprofit felt the effects of government budget cuts? What are you doing to make up the difference?


Medica Foundation’s 2008 Funding Priorities

February 18, 2008

Medica FoundationThe Medica Foundation has two opportunities to apply for funding in 2008. The funding priorities focus in the following areas:

  • Behavioral health (LOI accepted March 1-21)
  • Healthy living (LOI accepted March 1-21)
  • Health care disparities in the areas of prevention and health care literacy (LOI accepted June 1-20)

Read more about the funding priorities.


California State Senate Amends Assembly Bill 624

February 17, 2008

On Feb. 12, the California State Senate made several changes to A.B.624. In the new version of the bill, a foundation’s board and staff members are not required to report or provide information about their sexual orientation. However, the bill does require that foundations report the number of grants and the percentage of grant dollars that go to organizations that serve LGBT individuals and to organizations where at least 50 percent of the board is LGBT and where at least 50 percent of the staff is LGBT.

The legislation also adds a new reporting requirement: foundations would have to include the number of grants and percentage of grant dollars that are “awarded to predominantly low-income communities.” The legislation does not define this requirement or explain how it should be measured.

Finally, the amendment states that reporting is required only for domestic grants; the bill does not indicate whether this excludes all grants made outside California or grants outside the United States. The bill has been referred to the State Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration. Information from the national Council on Foundations

Background:
On Jan. 29, the California Assembly approved legislation to require big foundations to disclose the composition of their boards and employees by race, gender and sexual orientation, as well as information about the grants and business contracts they award to organizations that help specific minority groups.

Reactions from grantmaker associations:

Reactions from the media:

Join the conversation: What do you think? Should foundations be required to identify their grant recipients and even vendors by race, gender and sexual orientation?


A Changing Climate for Environmental Grantmakers

February 15, 2008

Wind energyAs critical environmental issues such as global warming and energy conservation become more complex, urgent and prominent, grantmakers across the nation are rethinking how they approach their work. In Minnesota, foundations and corporate funders are responding with new and more collaborative strategies as well as increased attention and funding.

Read more from MCF’s Giving Forum:


New Philanthropy Journal To Launch This Year

February 14, 2008

Johnson CenterA peer-reviewed, quarterly journal for philanthropy, The Foundation Review, is expected to launch in late 2008. The journal will be published by the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership at Grand Valley State University with help from a grant from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

Dr. Kathy Agard, executive director of the Johnson Center:

“The field of philanthropy has grown increasingly professionalized over the past 20 years. The time is now ripe to take another step in the development of the field by launching a journal devoted specifically to improving foundation philanthropy. We believe a peer-reviewed journal can help build the field’s knowledge base on both the science and the art of philanthropy.”

Jim McHale, Kellogg’s senior vice president for programs:

“Learning more about what’s happening in the arena of social change – what works and what doesn’t – is one of the best ways to improve our effectiveness. There’s a real hunger for learning from the experiences of others, yet there have been few mechanisms to promote that exchange of information.”


Bush Foundation Revising Guidelines

February 14, 2008

Bush FoundationBush Foundation is not currently accepting letters of inquiry for consideration, as the staff revises grantmaking guidelines to align them with the organization’s new strategic plan.

The foundation expects to announce the new guidelines, timetables and instructions by June 2008 for the foundation’s board review in November.

Bush Foundation’s schedule for grant approval in March and July is not changing. The change in schedule does not apply to the Dakota Creative Connections program of the Bush Artist Fellows Program.

Contact the foundation’s grants manager, Kelly Kleppe, at 651.379.2222 or kkleppe@bushfoundation.org with questions.


Welcome, Wendy!

February 12, 2008

Wendy WehrWendy Wehr was named vice president of communications and information services for the Minnesota Council on Foundations. She most recently served as development director for the Minnesota Literacy Council. She was previously senior vice president, group manager, at Minneapolis marketing communications firm Colle + McVoy.

Contact Wendy at wwehr@mcf.org or 612.335.3597.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,644 other followers